<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bush Vs. Obama &#8211; Who Spent The Most	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 19:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2303&quot;&gt;D.j. Starr&lt;/a&gt;.

how many have dies in the drone strikes?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2303">D.j. Starr</a>.</p>
<p>how many have dies in the drone strikes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4124</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2309&quot;&gt;Perrin Rynning&lt;/a&gt;.

show me the proof]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2309">Perrin Rynning</a>.</p>
<p>show me the proof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2315&quot;&gt;Richard Riedy&lt;/a&gt;.

still didn&#039;t answer thew question, and the tax cuts were for everybody dude]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2315">Richard Riedy</a>.</p>
<p>still didn&#039;t answer thew question, and the tax cuts were for everybody dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2313&quot;&gt;Jack Boardman&lt;/a&gt;.

Jack Boardman facts and liberal should never be used in the same sentence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2313">Jack Boardman</a>.</p>
<p>Jack Boardman facts and liberal should never be used in the same sentence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2313&quot;&gt;Jack Boardman&lt;/a&gt;.

i find something wrong with hisa policies. to say i am racist because i don&#039;t like his policies is racist in itself, my dear
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2313">Jack Boardman</a>.</p>
<p>i find something wrong with hisa policies. to say i am racist because i don&#039;t like his policies is racist in itself, my dear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4119</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3152&quot;&gt;James Bray&lt;/a&gt;.

i beg your pardon. when did it become racist to disagree with someones policies? you liberals always play the race card becuase you have no facts to support your argument
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3152">James Bray</a>.</p>
<p>i beg your pardon. when did it become racist to disagree with someones policies? you liberals always play the race card becuase you have no facts to support your argument</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2987&quot;&gt;Donald Logan&lt;/a&gt;.

that was easy becuse he hasn&#039;t done anything but flip flop and get us into mountains of debt- wheres the jobs?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2987">Donald Logan</a>.</p>
<p>that was easy becuse he hasn&#039;t done anything but flip flop and get us into mountains of debt- wheres the jobs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2316&quot;&gt;Jerry M. Allen&lt;/a&gt;.

why do you think most people in AZ hate black people?- that ia a pretty wide brush you are using- could it be the obvious chip you have on your shoulder?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2316">Jerry M. Allen</a>.</p>
<p>why do you think most people in AZ hate black people?- that ia a pretty wide brush you are using- could it be the obvious chip you have on your shoulder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3156&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

you sir, are an idiot- whty does his religion matter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3156">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>you sir, are an idiot- whty does his religion matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3158&quot;&gt;James Bray&lt;/a&gt;.

no, LKBJ actually said- we will have tose niggers voting democratic for 200 years and civil rights legislation would never have passed if not for republicans- it was the democrats that filibustered it- get your facts right before you start you demagoguing- racism is often used by liberals as a last resort- is that what you are attempting to do?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3158">James Bray</a>.</p>
<p>no, LKBJ actually said- we will have tose niggers voting democratic for 200 years and civil rights legislation would never have passed if not for republicans- it was the democrats that filibustered it- get your facts right before you start you demagoguing- racism is often used by liberals as a last resort- is that what you are attempting to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim McCandless		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-4114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCandless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-4114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3155&quot;&gt;Kevin Stanfield&lt;/a&gt;.

the stats are bogus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3155">Kevin Stanfield</a>.</p>
<p>the stats are bogus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rene H. Provencher		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rene H. Provencher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2316&quot;&gt;Jerry M. Allen&lt;/a&gt;.

Thomas O&#039;Hara Figures you&#039;re stillin fucking HS. I&#039;ve been through a war. So do something for your country!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-2316">Jerry M. Allen</a>.</p>
<p>Thomas O&#039;Hara Figures you&#039;re stillin fucking HS. I&#039;ve been through a war. So do something for your country!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rene H. Provencher		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rene H. Provencher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh my God! You don&#039;t believe the lies do you? You NEVER EVER start a war without raising taxes or selling war bonds. You don&#039;t give no bid contracts to your buds!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>Oh my God! You don&#039;t believe the lies do you? You NEVER EVER start a war without raising taxes or selling war bonds. You don&#039;t give no bid contracts to your buds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rene H. Provencher		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rene H. Provencher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3154&quot;&gt;Thomas Cincotta&lt;/a&gt;.

Halliburton and some undercover names for same owners have made BILLIONS! You dig deep enough the same guys making Billions During Reagan years are still making Billions off the backs of taxpayers. Not tax hiders! Dig deeper it starts with oil company owners…………..I saw huge crates of csh go to Iraq in Cargo planes, let us find out who got the cash?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3154">Thomas Cincotta</a>.</p>
<p>Halliburton and some undercover names for same owners have made BILLIONS! You dig deep enough the same guys making Billions During Reagan years are still making Billions off the backs of taxpayers. Not tax hiders! Dig deeper it starts with oil company owners…………..I saw huge crates of csh go to Iraq in Cargo planes, let us find out who got the cash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rain forest info		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rain forest info]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;If you&#039;re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you&#039;ll know which is right for ...&lt;/strong&gt;

you are in reality a good webmaster. The website loading velocity is amazing. It kind of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you&#039;ve performed a excellent job on this matter!...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If you&#8217;re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you&#8217;ll know which is right for &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>you are in reality a good webmaster. The website loading velocity is amazing. It kind of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you&#8217;ve performed a excellent job on this matter!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Logan		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3409</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

Thomas Cincotta&#060; Wow, now that is a very interesting conception.  If a surplus is inherited, as was with the case of Bush vs. Clinton, then shouldn&#039;t Bush have a boost in his first term economy?  And, if that be the cases why would you expect that Pres. Obama would NOT have a boost in his first 100 DAYS of a first term in which he inherited a massive DEFICIT, OR DEBT?  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>Thomas Cincotta&lt; Wow, now that is a very interesting conception.  If a surplus is inherited, as was with the case of Bush vs. Clinton, then shouldn&#039;t Bush have a boost in his first term economy?  And, if that be the cases why would you expect that Pres. Obama would NOT have a boost in his first 100 DAYS of a first term in which he inherited a massive DEFICIT, OR DEBT?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Carlucci		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Carlucci]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bush spent way more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush spent way more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norvin Adams III		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norvin Adams III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

I think we can save a lot of time and just go straight to the old Ronald Reagan line, &#034;Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?&#034;  I know I am not.

Obama never said he would work WITH anyone AFAIK.  As for experience, he was MY state senator and never stood out.  He got elected to Congress, gave that speech at the DNC for Kerry in 2004, got famous from it, ran for President in 2008, and the rest is history.  I am sorry, but being a former community organizer really isn&#039;t sufficient.

On the NPP, Obama didn&#039;t have to accept it.  As I recall during his speech for it, he did mention he was surprised to win it.  Well duh!  He had done nothing to win it other than being the first dark-skinned President of the USA.  I can&#039;t say African American as he isn&#039;t really (white Mom/black Dad).  I really wish Colin Powell would have run instead of McCain.  That would have been a great achievement for the Black community.  I think he would have made a fine President.

Anyway, Obama now has 4 years of experience as President, but not as being a good President.  History will remember him for being the first dark-skinned President, Obamacare, bailing out GM and Chrysler, and the financial chaos.

Lastly, don&#039;t forget that when Obama was elected that he had a Democrat-controlled Congress.  He should have been able to get more of his goals done, but that didn&#039;t happen.  The only goal of his that really got through was Obamacare which I think most people thought would be free healthcare for all at the time.  Now we all now it is just a bunch of new taxes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>I think we can save a lot of time and just go straight to the old Ronald Reagan line, &quot;Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?&quot;  I know I am not.</p>
<p>Obama never said he would work WITH anyone AFAIK.  As for experience, he was MY state senator and never stood out.  He got elected to Congress, gave that speech at the DNC for Kerry in 2004, got famous from it, ran for President in 2008, and the rest is history.  I am sorry, but being a former community organizer really isn&#039;t sufficient.</p>
<p>On the NPP, Obama didn&#039;t have to accept it.  As I recall during his speech for it, he did mention he was surprised to win it.  Well duh!  He had done nothing to win it other than being the first dark-skinned President of the USA.  I can&#039;t say African American as he isn&#039;t really (white Mom/black Dad).  I really wish Colin Powell would have run instead of McCain.  That would have been a great achievement for the Black community.  I think he would have made a fine President.</p>
<p>Anyway, Obama now has 4 years of experience as President, but not as being a good President.  History will remember him for being the first dark-skinned President, Obamacare, bailing out GM and Chrysler, and the financial chaos.</p>
<p>Lastly, don&#039;t forget that when Obama was elected that he had a Democrat-controlled Congress.  He should have been able to get more of his goals done, but that didn&#039;t happen.  The only goal of his that really got through was Obamacare which I think most people thought would be free healthcare for all at the time.  Now we all now it is just a bunch of new taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norvin Adams III		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norvin Adams III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

I think we can save a lot of time and just go straight to the old Ronald Reagan line, &#034;Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?&#034;  I know I am not.

Obama never said he would work WITH anyone AFAIK.  As for experience, he was MY state senator and never stood out.  He got elected to Congress, gave that speech at the DNC for Kerry in 2004, got famous from it, ran for President in 2008, and the rest is history.  I am sorry, but being a former community organizer really isn&#039;t sufficient.

On the NPP, Obama didn&#039;t have to accept it.  As I recall during his speech for it, he did mention he was surprised to win it.  Well duh!  He had done nothing to win it other than being the first dark-skinned President of the USA.  I can&#039;t say African American as he isn&#039;t really (white Mom/black Dad).  I really wish Colin Powell would have run instead of McCain.  That would have been a great achievement for the Black community.  I think he would have made a fine President.

Anyway, Obama now has 4 years of experience as President, but not as being a good President.  History will remember him for being the first dark-skinned President, Obamacare, bailing out GM and Chrysler, and the financial chaos.

Lastly, don&#039;t forget that when Obama was elected that he had a Democrat-controlled Congress.  He should have been able to get more of his goals done, but that didn&#039;t happen.  The only goal of his that really got through was Obamacare which I think most people thought would be free healthcare for all at the time.  Now we all now it is just a bunch of new taxes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>I think we can save a lot of time and just go straight to the old Ronald Reagan line, &quot;Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?&quot;  I know I am not.</p>
<p>Obama never said he would work WITH anyone AFAIK.  As for experience, he was MY state senator and never stood out.  He got elected to Congress, gave that speech at the DNC for Kerry in 2004, got famous from it, ran for President in 2008, and the rest is history.  I am sorry, but being a former community organizer really isn&#039;t sufficient.</p>
<p>On the NPP, Obama didn&#039;t have to accept it.  As I recall during his speech for it, he did mention he was surprised to win it.  Well duh!  He had done nothing to win it other than being the first dark-skinned President of the USA.  I can&#039;t say African American as he isn&#039;t really (white Mom/black Dad).  I really wish Colin Powell would have run instead of McCain.  That would have been a great achievement for the Black community.  I think he would have made a fine President.</p>
<p>Anyway, Obama now has 4 years of experience as President, but not as being a good President.  History will remember him for being the first dark-skinned President, Obamacare, bailing out GM and Chrysler, and the financial chaos.</p>
<p>Lastly, don&#039;t forget that when Obama was elected that he had a Democrat-controlled Congress.  He should have been able to get more of his goals done, but that didn&#039;t happen.  The only goal of his that really got through was Obamacare which I think most people thought would be free healthcare for all at the time.  Now we all now it is just a bunch of new taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Logan		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are a great Debater, Norvin and I will go just this one more round with you. I am not demeaning you or anything you are saying. I do not think that you are &#034;dumb&#034; nor am I trying to go &#034;one up&#034; on or with you. I just want you and anyone that maybe &#034;friendly&#034; looking on an paying attention to realize that Mitt Romney has not said or done anything that Barack Obama said or did in his 2008 campaign. 

&#062;As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&#034;

Every candidate for every political office or Public employment has said &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you&#034;   Every dictator and every coniving con man has said &#034;I&#039;ll work FOR you&#034;.  What would you expect them to say; &#034; I&#039;am going to bleed you dry&#034;? 

&#062;Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track. 

I ask you; What are they? Romney has not told us. All Romney or Ryan have said is: &#034;WE HAVE A PLAN&#034;.  Obama had a &#034;Plan&#034; in 2008; It may have only been in his mind, but Norvin, face it, We All have plans. Whether or not we succeed in FULFILLING those plans depends upon circumstances, opportunity, obstructions, and or resources.  Have you accomplished and fulfilled every plan that you have conceived in your mind?  Think about what I am saying, I believe I sense what you feel, but look at reality. 

&#062;Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in. 

If Obama had experience going in, why would he need On Job Training?   Does Mitt Romney have any experience &#034;going in&#034; at BEING President.  At the least as you said, Obama NOW has, {experience at being President} and also has the circumstance, opportunity, barring obstruction and the resourses {4 more years} to correct, restore, and succeed; in the IMPLEMENTING of his original Plans.  Romney for all intent and purposes can only START laying out his plan if elected in 2013; and begin treading the same path that Obama did in 2009. If President Barack Obama is re-elected; he can not run again. But if Mitt Romney is ELECTED, and by some act of fate, he fails, we will be back into this debate once again in 4 more years. 

Finally Don&#039;t you think that your comment regarding the award of the Nobel Prize might have been, not so much unfavorable to Barack Obama, to say that he did NOTHING to earn it? But rather could be construed as being a &#034;slap in the face&#034; of those who awarded it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a great Debater, Norvin and I will go just this one more round with you. I am not demeaning you or anything you are saying. I do not think that you are &quot;dumb&quot; nor am I trying to go &quot;one up&quot; on or with you. I just want you and anyone that maybe &quot;friendly&quot; looking on an paying attention to realize that Mitt Romney has not said or done anything that Barack Obama said or did in his 2008 campaign. </p>
<p>&gt;As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&quot;</p>
<p>Every candidate for every political office or Public employment has said &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you&quot;   Every dictator and every coniving con man has said &quot;I&#039;ll work FOR you&quot;.  What would you expect them to say; &quot; I&#039;am going to bleed you dry&quot;? </p>
<p>&gt;Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track. </p>
<p>I ask you; What are they? Romney has not told us. All Romney or Ryan have said is: &quot;WE HAVE A PLAN&quot;.  Obama had a &quot;Plan&quot; in 2008; It may have only been in his mind, but Norvin, face it, We All have plans. Whether or not we succeed in FULFILLING those plans depends upon circumstances, opportunity, obstructions, and or resources.  Have you accomplished and fulfilled every plan that you have conceived in your mind?  Think about what I am saying, I believe I sense what you feel, but look at reality. </p>
<p>&gt;Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in. </p>
<p>If Obama had experience going in, why would he need On Job Training?   Does Mitt Romney have any experience &quot;going in&quot; at BEING President.  At the least as you said, Obama NOW has, {experience at being President} and also has the circumstance, opportunity, barring obstruction and the resourses {4 more years} to correct, restore, and succeed; in the IMPLEMENTING of his original Plans.  Romney for all intent and purposes can only START laying out his plan if elected in 2013; and begin treading the same path that Obama did in 2009. If President Barack Obama is re-elected; he can not run again. But if Mitt Romney is ELECTED, and by some act of fate, he fails, we will be back into this debate once again in 4 more years. </p>
<p>Finally Don&#039;t you think that your comment regarding the award of the Nobel Prize might have been, not so much unfavorable to Barack Obama, to say that he did NOTHING to earn it? But rather could be construed as being a &quot;slap in the face&quot; of those who awarded it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Logan		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3195</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3195</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

You are a great Debater, Norvin and I will go just this one more round with you.  I am not demeaning you or anything you are saying. I do not think that you are &#034;dumb&#034; nor am I trying to go &#034;one up&#034; on or with you. I just want you and anyone that maybe &#034;friendly&#034; looking on an paying attention to realize that Mitt Romney has not said or done anything that Barack Obama said or did in his 2008 campaign.  

As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&#034;

Every candidate for every political office or Public employment has said &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you&#034;  Every dictator and every coniving con man has said &#034;I&#039;ll work FOR you&#034;.  What would you expect them to say; I&#039;am going to bleed you dry&#034;? 

 Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.   I ask you What are they?  Romney has not told us.  All Romney or Ryan have said is: &#034;WE HAVE A PLAN&#034;.  Obama had a &#034;Plan&#034; in 2008; It may have only been in his mind, but Norvin, face it, We All have plans.  Whether or not we succeed in FULFILLING those plans depends upon circumstanced, opportunity, obstructions, and or resources.  Have you accomplished and fulfilled every plan that you have conceived in your mind?  Think about what I am saying, I sense what you feel, but look at reality.  

Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  If Obama had experience going in, why would he need On Job Training?   Does Mitt Romney have any experience &#034;going in&#034; at BEING President. At the least as you said, Obama NOW has, and also has the circumstance, opportunity, barring obstruction and the resourses {4 more years} to correct, restore, and succeed in the IMPLEMENTING of his original Plans.  Romney for all intent and purposes can only start laying out his plan if elected in 2013 and begin treading the same path that Obama did in 2009.  Finally Don&#039;t you think that your comment regarding the award of the Nobel Prize might have been not so much unfavorable to Barack Obama, to say that he did NOTHING to earn it, but rather could be construed as a &#034;slap in the face&#034; of those who awarded it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>You are a great Debater, Norvin and I will go just this one more round with you.  I am not demeaning you or anything you are saying. I do not think that you are &quot;dumb&quot; nor am I trying to go &quot;one up&quot; on or with you. I just want you and anyone that maybe &quot;friendly&quot; looking on an paying attention to realize that Mitt Romney has not said or done anything that Barack Obama said or did in his 2008 campaign.  </p>
<p>As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&quot;</p>
<p>Every candidate for every political office or Public employment has said &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you&quot;  Every dictator and every coniving con man has said &quot;I&#039;ll work FOR you&quot;.  What would you expect them to say; I&#039;am going to bleed you dry&quot;? </p>
<p> Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.   I ask you What are they?  Romney has not told us.  All Romney or Ryan have said is: &quot;WE HAVE A PLAN&quot;.  Obama had a &quot;Plan&quot; in 2008; It may have only been in his mind, but Norvin, face it, We All have plans.  Whether or not we succeed in FULFILLING those plans depends upon circumstanced, opportunity, obstructions, and or resources.  Have you accomplished and fulfilled every plan that you have conceived in your mind?  Think about what I am saying, I sense what you feel, but look at reality.  </p>
<p>Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  If Obama had experience going in, why would he need On Job Training?   Does Mitt Romney have any experience &quot;going in&quot; at BEING President. At the least as you said, Obama NOW has, and also has the circumstance, opportunity, barring obstruction and the resourses {4 more years} to correct, restore, and succeed in the IMPLEMENTING of his original Plans.  Romney for all intent and purposes can only start laying out his plan if elected in 2013 and begin treading the same path that Obama did in 2009.  Finally Don&#039;t you think that your comment regarding the award of the Nobel Prize might have been not so much unfavorable to Barack Obama, to say that he did NOTHING to earn it, but rather could be construed as a &quot;slap in the face&quot; of those who awarded it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Logan		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

You are a great Debater, Norvin and I will go just this one more round with you.  I am not demeaning you or anything you are saying. I do not think that you are &#034;dumb&#034; nor am I trying to go &#034;one up&#034; on or with you. I just want you and anyone that maybe &#034;friendly&#034; looking on an paying attention to realize that Mitt Romney has not said or done anything that Barack Obama said or did in his 2008 campaign.  

As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&#034;

Every candidate for every political office or Public employment has said &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you&#034;  Every dictator and every coniving con man has said &#034;I&#039;ll work FOR you&#034;.  What would you expect them to say; I&#039;am going to bleed you dry&#034;? 

 Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.   I ask you What are they?  Romney has not told us.  All Romney or Ryan have said is: &#034;WE HAVE A PLAN&#034;.  Obama had a &#034;Plan&#034; in 2008; It may have only been in his mind, but Norvin, face it, We All have plans.  Whether or not we succeed in FULFILLING those plans depends upon circumstanced, opportunity, obstructions, and or resources.  Have you accomplished and fulfilled every plan that you have conceived in your mind?  Think about what I am saying, I sense what you feel, but look at reality.  

Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  If Obama had experience going in, why would he need On Job Training?   Does Mitt Romney have any experience &#034;going in&#034; at BEING President. At the least as you said, Obama NOW has, and also has the circumstance, opportunity, barring obstruction and the resourses {4 more years} to correct, restore, and succeed in the IMPLEMENTING of his original Plans.  Romney for all intent and purposes can only start laying out his plan if elected in 2013 and begin treading the same path that Obama did in 2009.  Finally Don&#039;t you think that your comment regarding the award of the Nobel Prize might have been not so much unfavorable to Barack Obama, to say that he did NOTHING to earn it, but rather could be construed as a &#034;slap in the face&#034; of those who awarded it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>You are a great Debater, Norvin and I will go just this one more round with you.  I am not demeaning you or anything you are saying. I do not think that you are &quot;dumb&quot; nor am I trying to go &quot;one up&quot; on or with you. I just want you and anyone that maybe &quot;friendly&quot; looking on an paying attention to realize that Mitt Romney has not said or done anything that Barack Obama said or did in his 2008 campaign.  </p>
<p>As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&quot;</p>
<p>Every candidate for every political office or Public employment has said &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you&quot;  Every dictator and every coniving con man has said &quot;I&#039;ll work FOR you&quot;.  What would you expect them to say; I&#039;am going to bleed you dry&quot;? </p>
<p> Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.   I ask you What are they?  Romney has not told us.  All Romney or Ryan have said is: &quot;WE HAVE A PLAN&quot;.  Obama had a &quot;Plan&quot; in 2008; It may have only been in his mind, but Norvin, face it, We All have plans.  Whether or not we succeed in FULFILLING those plans depends upon circumstanced, opportunity, obstructions, and or resources.  Have you accomplished and fulfilled every plan that you have conceived in your mind?  Think about what I am saying, I sense what you feel, but look at reality.  </p>
<p>Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  If Obama had experience going in, why would he need On Job Training?   Does Mitt Romney have any experience &quot;going in&quot; at BEING President. At the least as you said, Obama NOW has, and also has the circumstance, opportunity, barring obstruction and the resourses {4 more years} to correct, restore, and succeed in the IMPLEMENTING of his original Plans.  Romney for all intent and purposes can only start laying out his plan if elected in 2013 and begin treading the same path that Obama did in 2009.  Finally Don&#039;t you think that your comment regarding the award of the Nobel Prize might have been not so much unfavorable to Barack Obama, to say that he did NOTHING to earn it, but rather could be construed as a &quot;slap in the face&quot; of those who awarded it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norvin Adams III		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3194</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norvin Adams III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

The public debt is just that; public.  I think a lot of people forget that we live in a Republic and not a Democracy.  We elect people to represent us.  We do not directly make policy.  That would be a big mess, lol.

It is undeniable Obama has done dumb things to increase it such as bailing out GM and Chrysler and making bad investments into companies.  Personally, I think on top of church and state being separate that business and state should also do the same other than the government placing policies to keep consumers safe.

Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.  I doubt he would be able to make the public debt go away, but I am hopeful he can lower it.  As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&#034;

Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  Romney has the experiences needed to be a good President such as being a successful businessman and a well-liked Governor.  Every one of our current problems comes back to this; our economy.  And the economy has become worse these last 4 years.  When people have less money to spend then they buy less.  It hurts us ALL.

It still astounds me Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize.  He did NOTHING to deserve it and, as time has shown us, he has gotten us into new wars.  I am not a racist, but it is my opinion Obama won the NPP and the Presidency simply because he is half-Black and speaks well with a teleprompter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>The public debt is just that; public.  I think a lot of people forget that we live in a Republic and not a Democracy.  We elect people to represent us.  We do not directly make policy.  That would be a big mess, lol.</p>
<p>It is undeniable Obama has done dumb things to increase it such as bailing out GM and Chrysler and making bad investments into companies.  Personally, I think on top of church and state being separate that business and state should also do the same other than the government placing policies to keep consumers safe.</p>
<p>Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.  I doubt he would be able to make the public debt go away, but I am hopeful he can lower it.  As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&quot;</p>
<p>Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  Romney has the experiences needed to be a good President such as being a successful businessman and a well-liked Governor.  Every one of our current problems comes back to this; our economy.  And the economy has become worse these last 4 years.  When people have less money to spend then they buy less.  It hurts us ALL.</p>
<p>It still astounds me Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize.  He did NOTHING to deserve it and, as time has shown us, he has gotten us into new wars.  I am not a racist, but it is my opinion Obama won the NPP and the Presidency simply because he is half-Black and speaks well with a teleprompter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norvin Adams III		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3193</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norvin Adams III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

The public debt is just that; public.  I think a lot of people forget that we live in a Republic and not a Democracy.  We elect people to represent us.  We do not directly make policy.  That would be a big mess, lol.

It is undeniable Obama has done dumb things to increase it such as bailing out GM and Chrysler and making bad investments into companies.  Personally, I think on top of church and state being separate that business and state should also do the same other than the government placing policies to keep consumers safe.

Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.  I doubt he would be able to make the public debt go away, but I am hopeful he can lower it.  As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &#034;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&#034;

Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  Romney has the experiences needed to be a good President such as being a successful businessman and a well-liked Governor.  Every one of our current problems comes back to this; our economy.  And the economy has become worse these last 4 years.  When people have less money to spend then they buy less.  It hurts us ALL.

It still astounds me Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize.  He did NOTHING to deserve it and, as time has shown us, he has gotten us into new wars.  I am not a racist, but it is my opinion Obama won the NPP and the Presidency simply because he is half-Black and speaks well with a teleprompter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>The public debt is just that; public.  I think a lot of people forget that we live in a Republic and not a Democracy.  We elect people to represent us.  We do not directly make policy.  That would be a big mess, lol.</p>
<p>It is undeniable Obama has done dumb things to increase it such as bailing out GM and Chrysler and making bad investments into companies.  Personally, I think on top of church and state being separate that business and state should also do the same other than the government placing policies to keep consumers safe.</p>
<p>Of the three Presidential Debates, it constantly seems to me that Romney has an actual plan to get us back on the right track.  I doubt he would be able to make the public debt go away, but I am hopeful he can lower it.  As Romney said in his closing statement tonight, &quot;I&#039;ll work WITH you.&quot;</p>
<p>Other than the on-the-job training Obama has gained by being President these last 4 years, he had no experience going in.  Romney has the experiences needed to be a good President such as being a successful businessman and a well-liked Governor.  Every one of our current problems comes back to this; our economy.  And the economy has become worse these last 4 years.  When people have less money to spend then they buy less.  It hurts us ALL.</p>
<p>It still astounds me Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize.  He did NOTHING to deserve it and, as time has shown us, he has gotten us into new wars.  I am not a racist, but it is my opinion Obama won the NPP and the Presidency simply because he is half-Black and speaks well with a teleprompter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Logan		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

That was a hypothetical Norvin my error was capitalizing &#034;your&#034; the point was that if you start out with a negative balance, anything added to it would continue to be negative.  If (a person) is concerned about their domestic assets, they tend to increase with necessity. The President spends according to the needs of the country which is a resposibility.  The only difference in the budget of the President and the budget of a householder is the amout of zeroes at the end of the dollar sign .  Sure Obama made predictions and promises, so did Romney during the debate.  Do you think that Romney could accomplish everything he promises to do in less time than Obama had?  That was the jist of my comment. It had nothing at all to do with your credit card.  Barack Obama had every right to  BELIEVE he would accomplish his goals.  Like someone said to me, It is hard to determine the tone of a statement made in this type of format. Everyone that posts is not griping.  Some are just commenting and sharing opinion and making examples.  and BTW my example may not change the fact that the &#034;public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.&#034; but ist sure does explain the mechanics of why it is and if Romney becomes President it will become his deficit. Will he have the ability to handle it any better? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>That was a hypothetical Norvin my error was capitalizing &quot;your&quot; the point was that if you start out with a negative balance, anything added to it would continue to be negative.  If (a person) is concerned about their domestic assets, they tend to increase with necessity. The President spends according to the needs of the country which is a resposibility.  The only difference in the budget of the President and the budget of a householder is the amout of zeroes at the end of the dollar sign .  Sure Obama made predictions and promises, so did Romney during the debate.  Do you think that Romney could accomplish everything he promises to do in less time than Obama had?  That was the jist of my comment. It had nothing at all to do with your credit card.  Barack Obama had every right to  BELIEVE he would accomplish his goals.  Like someone said to me, It is hard to determine the tone of a statement made in this type of format. Everyone that posts is not griping.  Some are just commenting and sharing opinion and making examples.  and BTW my example may not change the fact that the &quot;public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.&quot; but ist sure does explain the mechanics of why it is and if Romney becomes President it will become his deficit. Will he have the ability to handle it any better? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Logan		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

That was a hypothetical Norvin my error was capitalizing &#034;your&#034; the point was that if you start out with a negative balance, anything added to it would continue to be negative.  If (a person) is concerned about their domestic assets, they tend to increase with necessity. The President spends according to the needs of the country which is a resposibility.  The only difference in the budget of the President and the budget of a householder is the amout of zeroes at the end of the dollar sign .  Sure Obama made predictions and promises, so did Romney during the debate.  Do you think that Romney could accomplish everything he promises to do in less time than Obama had?  That was the jist of my comment. It had nothing at all to do with your credit card.  Barack Obama had every right to  BELIEVE he would accomplish his goals.  Like someone said to me, It is hard to determine the tone of a statement made in this type of format. Everyone that posts is not griping.  Some are just commenting and sharing opinion and making examples.  and BTW my example may not change the fact that the &#034;public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.&#034; but ist sure does explain the mechanics of why it is and if Romney becomes President it will become his deficit. Will he have the ability to handle it any better? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>That was a hypothetical Norvin my error was capitalizing &quot;your&quot; the point was that if you start out with a negative balance, anything added to it would continue to be negative.  If (a person) is concerned about their domestic assets, they tend to increase with necessity. The President spends according to the needs of the country which is a resposibility.  The only difference in the budget of the President and the budget of a householder is the amout of zeroes at the end of the dollar sign .  Sure Obama made predictions and promises, so did Romney during the debate.  Do you think that Romney could accomplish everything he promises to do in less time than Obama had?  That was the jist of my comment. It had nothing at all to do with your credit card.  Barack Obama had every right to  BELIEVE he would accomplish his goals.  Like someone said to me, It is hard to determine the tone of a statement made in this type of format. Everyone that posts is not griping.  Some are just commenting and sharing opinion and making examples.  and BTW my example may not change the fact that the &quot;public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.&quot; but ist sure does explain the mechanics of why it is and if Romney becomes President it will become his deficit. Will he have the ability to handle it any better? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norvin Adams III		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norvin Adams III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

MY credit has nothing to do with this Donald Logan.  Thankfully I take responsibility with my spending habits and use an actual budget.  This still doesn&#039;t change the fact that the public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.  A 62% increase by one President in one term is astounding!  From 2001-2008 under Bush, it went up $4 trillion.  I really hope Romney gets elected and starts the long process of getting this under control.  It will take decades for our country to get out of the hole.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>MY credit has nothing to do with this Donald Logan.  Thankfully I take responsibility with my spending habits and use an actual budget.  This still doesn&#039;t change the fact that the public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.  A 62% increase by one President in one term is astounding!  From 2001-2008 under Bush, it went up $4 trillion.  I really hope Romney gets elected and starts the long process of getting this under control.  It will take decades for our country to get out of the hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norvin Adams III		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norvin Adams III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

MY credit has nothing to do with this Donald Logan.  Thankfully I take responsibility with my spending habits and use an actual budget.  This still doesn&#039;t change the fact that the public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.  A 62% increase by one President in one term is astounding!  From 2001-2008 under Bush, it went up $4 trillion.  I really hope Romney gets elected and starts the long process of getting this under control.  It will take decades for our country to get out of the hole.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>MY credit has nothing to do with this Donald Logan.  Thankfully I take responsibility with my spending habits and use an actual budget.  This still doesn&#039;t change the fact that the public debt is now $16.2 trillion under Obama when he started with a public debt of $10 trillion.  A 62% increase by one President in one term is astounding!  From 2001-2008 under Bush, it went up $4 trillion.  I really hope Romney gets elected and starts the long process of getting this under control.  It will take decades for our country to get out of the hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Bray		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Belittling a black woman for being part of the GOP is not racism. Would it be racism if I thought it odd a black woman would seek inclusion in the KKK? During the Lincoln era Democrats were racist and the KKK was an anti-republican party (as Lincoln was the first Republican president.) LBJ was considered a turncoat for his hard-line abolition of Jim Crow which lead to the demise of the &#034;Democratic South&#034; Through the 1960s the South typically voted Democratically, but the Civil Rights Act dramatically realigned allegiances. Just before signing the bill, President Lyndon Johnson said, “I think we have just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come.” The success of civil rights legislation alienated Southern Democrats who felt the party no longer supported their interests; the South quickly became a Republican-dominated region while Democrats congregated in the North. Currently, there are zero Republican congressmen from the New England states, and the South is similarly low on Democrats. Thomas O&#039;hara is clearly a bigot as he cannot articulate anything but hatred and name-calling...if pressed he will spew Sean Hannit. D.J. Starr needs to reconsider what racism is!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belittling a black woman for being part of the GOP is not racism. Would it be racism if I thought it odd a black woman would seek inclusion in the KKK? During the Lincoln era Democrats were racist and the KKK was an anti-republican party (as Lincoln was the first Republican president.) LBJ was considered a turncoat for his hard-line abolition of Jim Crow which lead to the demise of the &quot;Democratic South&quot; Through the 1960s the South typically voted Democratically, but the Civil Rights Act dramatically realigned allegiances. Just before signing the bill, President Lyndon Johnson said, “I think we have just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come.” The success of civil rights legislation alienated Southern Democrats who felt the party no longer supported their interests; the South quickly became a Republican-dominated region while Democrats congregated in the North. Currently, there are zero Republican congressmen from the New England states, and the South is similarly low on Democrats. Thomas O&#039;hara is clearly a bigot as he cannot articulate anything but hatred and name-calling&#8230;if pressed he will spew Sean Hannit. D.J. Starr needs to reconsider what racism is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Logan		</title>
		<link>https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ezkool.com/?p=10448#comment-3188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153&quot;&gt;Norvin Adams III&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree that &#034;Comparing a former 2-term President&#039;s total spending to one still in his first and possibly only term whose spending is not complete doesn&#039;t seem to be a fair comparison.&#034;  But; Norvin Adams III: I also hear the SUBTLE. tongue in cheek, enuendo and subliminal suggestion  &#034;and possibly only term&#034; ...and that definitely is not fair. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ezkool.com/2011/07/two-potus-spending-2/#comment-3153">Norvin Adams III</a>.</p>
<p>I agree that &quot;Comparing a former 2-term President&#039;s total spending to one still in his first and possibly only term whose spending is not complete doesn&#039;t seem to be a fair comparison.&quot;  But; Norvin Adams III: I also hear the SUBTLE. tongue in cheek, enuendo and subliminal suggestion  &quot;and possibly only term&quot; &#8230;and that definitely is not fair. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
