From what I read from the Ari­zona Repub­lic site, the law was being intro­duced because of an impli­ca­tion that abor­tions are being per­formed for women who do not want to con­tinue the with preg­nan­cies because they do not like the race or the sex of the child.
So the ques­tions are now–what study was done to make this deter­mi­na­tion?;what woman would admit this to their doc­tor as the rea­son they’d want to have an abor­tion?; and finally, is this not a patient/doctor con­fi­den­tial­ity and an intru­sion into a woman’s pri­vacy to now have a ‘selec­tion jury’ that will ascer­tain why a woman wishes to have the pro­ce­dure done?
It sounds like the bill was intro­duced only to make it look like Ms. Brewer was on the case with her anti-abortion stance. It sounds ridiculous

@AZDem – Your question is answered in the included link for The Arizona Republic.